Overview

Rayfont South Bund Hotel Shanghai

118 Nancang Street, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200011, China
+86 216 377 1188

Rp 426,667+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
Based on 2,558 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.5
  • 8.4
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

Nearby

    show all

    About

    At Rayfont South Bund Hotel Shanghai, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of The Bund and Yu Yuan Garden. Guests can take a dip in the indoor pool or grab a bite to eat at Yu Sheng Fang restaurant, which serves lunch and dinner. Rooms at this upscale hotel offer up nice touches like pillow menus, bathrobes, and slippers.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Coffee shop
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Concierge service
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Room service
    • Game room
    • Indoor pool
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • ATM on-site
    • Laundry facilities
    • Restaurant
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    • Free parking
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 2,558 reviews
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
      9.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 90%."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      8.9 "89% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.1 "91% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.3 "83% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 87%."
    • 8.4 "Good value."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      5.9 "Only 59% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.6 "Only 56% thought the service was professional."
      6.3 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 63%."
      5.7 "Only 57% were satisfied with the booking process."
    • 4.5 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.8 "For 82%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.0 "Unclean dining area, according to 100%."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% complained about the bathroom."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      4.3 "57% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."
      2.8 "72% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.4 "76% found problems with the furniture."
      0.7 "93% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
      1.7 "83% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.7 "63% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    Based on 792 reviews
    • 8.7 "Good value."
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
      9.6 "Near to public transport, according to 96%."
      8.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 88%."
      8.7 "87% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.3 "City centre within easy reach, said 83%."
    • 5.2 "Service is ok."
      5.3 "53% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.7 "Only 57% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.3 "Only 53% thought the service was professional."
      5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.0 "70% had problems with the shower."
      4.2 "58% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      3.4 "66% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.9 "Internet is poor."
      3.8 "62% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      4.2 "58% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    Based on 460 reviews
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 8.3 "Location is great."
      8.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 89%."
      9.2 "Near to public transport, according to 92%."
    • 6.1 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.9 "Internet is poor."
      3.8 "62% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.7 Good
    Based on 920 reviews
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 91%."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.3 "Service is ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.3 "63% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.0 "For 80%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."
      4.2 "58% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.8 "62% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.0 "For 80%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    Based on 383 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      9.6 "Near to public transport, according to 96%."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.4 "Good value."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      5.4 "Only 54% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.6 "Not very clean."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were dirty."
      2.5 "75% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      3.6 "64% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      2.5 "75% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close