Overview
×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Muangphol Mansion

931/9 Soi Kaseamsaan 1, Rama 1 Rd. Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
+66 2 219 4445

Rp 373,334+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
Based on 1,306 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.7
  • 4.9
  • 4.6
  • 3.3

Nearby

    show all

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 hour front desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 1,306 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
    • 5.7 "Internet is average."
    • 4.9 "Service is below average."
      4.6 "54% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      4.0 "60% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.6 "84% thought it was too noisy."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      1.4 "86% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were dirty."
      0.6 "For 94%, the rooms looked old."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.4 "76% found problems with the furniture."
      2.3 "77% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% were disappointed with the minibar."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.3 "77% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.0 "For 80%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.0 "90% didn't like the architecture."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    Based on 639 reviews
    • 9.9 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.2 "Internet is average."
    • 4.9 "Not very clean."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.8 "Service is below average."
      4.1 "59% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.8 "82% thought it was too noisy."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      1.5 "85% complained about the bathroom."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% had problems with the shower."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.9 "81% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    Based on 274 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 4.8 "Service is below average."
      4.1 "59% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      3.7 "63% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 4.0 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.4 "86% thought it was too noisy."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
    • 2.6 "Awful rooms."
      1.3 "87% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were dirty."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      0.3 "97% had problems with the shower."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 26 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 4.9 "Service is below average."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 365 reviews
    • 9.9 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.9 "Internet is average."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.5 "85% thought it was too noisy."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were small."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      1.4 "86% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
      0.5 "95% had problems with the shower."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were small."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews


    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close